After `Nargis’, mangrove restoration lacks vision. Jakarta Post, 13 May

As news images of devastated landscapes and bloated corpses appeared in the days and weeks after Nargis, environmental campaigners made their point: if Myanmar’s 3,000-km coastline had kept its original fringe of mangroves, the damage would have been less. Perhaps, some of those who died – up to 140,000 people, by some counts – could have been saved.

Today most governments acknowledge the importance of mangroves in dissipating the force of storms, and tides and waves caused by extreme events like Nargis. Mangroves serve as natural nurseries and feeding grounds for three-quarters of all commercially fished species in the tropics. Their unique root systems capture sediment and prevent erosion. They also filter out pollutants that would otherwise flow into the sea.

Mangrove restoration is more popular than ever before. Following Cyclone Nargis, Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN, emphasised the role of mangroves in mitigating the impact of natural disasters. Before that, in the wake of the Asian tsunami Bill Clinton hosted a meeting in New York to launch “Mangroves for the Future”, a multi-party project focusing on mangrove conservation in tsunami-affected countries. The Red Cross is funding major replantation efforts in Vietnam and Thailand, and Japanese government aid is supporting mangrove plantations across Asia.

However, many attempts at mangrove restoration are deeply flawed.

Mangroves are being planted in areas that never supported mangroves in the first place. In Thailand, for example, the government has been very supportive of mangrove restoration, but re-planting efforts often do not consider local ecosystems. Mangrove forests are part of a larger coastal ecosystem that typically includes mudflats, sea grass meadows, tidal marshes and salt pans. They may be linked with inland forests, peat lands, and freshwater rivers and streams. Approaches to mangrove restoration need to consider how new trees will affect existing ecosystems, and whether suitable sites are selected.

In Thailand mangroves have been planted on coastal mudflats, resulting in loss of habitat and feeding grounds for migratory birds, shellfish and other shore life – leading to conflicts with local fishermen who depend on the mudflats for their livelihood. Experience from the Philippines shows that the survival rate of mangroves planted in unsuitable terrain like this is very low. In Sri Lanka, it has been shown that extensive planting of mangroves in lagoon areas has led to an overall reduction in fish productivity.

Then there are issues of land rights and livelihoods linked to the restoration of mangroves, where the brackish water supports shrimp farming. Unclear land right systems and zoning of coastal areas are major challenges to the effectiveness of mangrove restoration in the long term.

The Mahakam delta in East Kalimantan has become one of the wealthiest areas of Indonesia due to local shrimp aquaculture, as well as gas exploration in areas formerly covered by mangrove.

Here, shrimp pond owners grow “organic” white-spot shrimp in large-scale, low-intensity systems with few chemical inputs – a practice that allows them to command higher market prices as compared with shrimp from high-intensive, smaller pond cultivation that is common elsewhere in Asia. This land-hungry enterprise has led to the loss of almost 80 per cent of the mangroves in the delta, despite the fact that most of the area is officially classified as a conservation zone.

Companies drilling for natural gas in the Mahakam delta are paying compensation to farmers for the loss of mangroves due to gas exploration. While only a small amount of mangrove loss is traced directly to gas exploration, the knock-on effects are far-reaching. Local people who have customary rights to stands of mangrove are now clearing new areas in the hope of being able to get money for the exercise. Others are holding on to old shrimp ponds that have become unproductive, rather than converting the land to other uses, in the hope of also being able to claim compensation. The lack of transparency and ambiguities in this process has led to conflicts between farmers and companies, in addition to losses of natural assets.

It is important to acknowledge current land use practices in designing mangrove restoration plans, in order to reduce conflicts between user groups, and to support law enforcement to limit further conversion and ensure long term sustainability of replanted areas.

The revival of interest in mangroves following the devastation of Nargis, should now be harnessed in designing and implementing programmes that contribute to sustainable coastal resource management. Such solutions must consider the livelihoods of local people, as well as incentives for them to maintain existing natural assets. Mangroves have many uses, and many people benefit from them. It would be a great pity if the current enthusiasm for mangroves should falter, due to a failure to reconcile conflicting aims.

Mangrove restoration should contribute to the ecosystem and local communities – and not merely to impressive statistics on how many trees have been planted.