Author(s): Garrett, R. D., T. A. Gardner, T. F. Morello, S. Marchand, J. Barlow, D. Ezzine de Blas, J. Ferreira, A. C. Lees and L. Parry

Year: 2017

In: Ecology and Society, 22(3), p.27

DOI: 10.5751/ES-09364-220327

Type: Journal article

Language:
English

Centre:
Stockholm

Link to SEI author:

Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon

cattle amazon kelly satoCattle in the Brazilian state of Pará. Despite low incomes cattle ranching remains a major driver of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Photo: Kelly Sato / Flickr

The article suggests that policy to transition farmers away from cattle-ranching and other unsustainable land uses in the Brazilian Amazon need to address non-monetary subjective factors, as well as poor supply chain infrastructure.

Tropical forests continue to be plagued by the dual sustainability challenges of deforestation and rural poverty. This article explores why many of the farmers living in the Brazilian Amazon, home to the world’s largest tropical agricultural-forest frontier, persist in agricultural activities associated with low incomes and high environmental damage.

To answer this question, the authors assess the factors that shape the development and distribution of agricultural activities and farmer well-being in these frontiers. They use a uniquely comprehensive social-ecological dataset from two regions in the eastern Brazilian Amazon and employ a novel conceptual framework that highlights the interdependencies between household attributes, agricultural activities, and well-being.

The article finds that livestock production, which yields the lowest per-hectare incomes, remains the most prevalent land use in remote areas, but many examples of high-income fruit, horticulture and staple crop production exist on small properties, particularly in peri-urban areas.

The transition to more profitable land uses is limited by lagging supply chain infrastructure, social preferences, and the fact that income associated with land use activities is not a primary source of perceived life quality. Instead, subjective well-being is more heavily influenced by the non-monetary attributes of a rural lifestyle (safety, tranquility, community relations, etc.).

The authors conclude that transitions away from low-income land uses in agricultural-forest frontiers of the Brazilian Amazon need not abandon a land-focused vision of development, but will require policies and programmes that identify and differentiate households based on a broader set of household assets, cultural attributes, and aspirations than are traditionally applied. More broadly, access to distant markets for high-value crops must be improved via investments in processing, storage, and marketing infrastructure.

 

Read the article (external link to journal – open access)

 

Share:
FacebookTwitterLinkedin