Author(s): Ryan Plummer, Julia Baird, Ryan Bullock, Angela Dzyundzyak, Diane Dupont, Åsa Gerger Swartling, Åse Johannessen, Dave Huitema, Anna Lyth, Maria de Lourdes Melo Zurita, Stefania Munaretto, Timothy Smith and Dana Thomsen

Year: 2017

In: Environmental Policy and Governance, online 19 December 2017

DOI: 10.1002/eet.1796

Type: Journal article



Link to SEI authors:

Flood governance: a multiple country comparison of stakeholder perceptions and aspirations

Flooding QLD NSWFlooding on the Cunningham Highway, Australia. Photo: Tatiana Gerus / Flickr

Stakeholders in Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden perceive that current flood governance arrangements fall far short of inclusive ideals.

Flooding has extensive impacts on human well-being, economies and ecosystems. Thus, how decisions are made about floods (i.e. flood governance) is extremely important and evidence shows that it is changing, with civil society and the private sector becoming involved in new and sometimes hybrid governance arrangements.

This study investigates how stakeholders perceive floods to be governed and how they believe decision-making ought to occur, with the intent of determining to what extent changing governance is evident on the ground and how well it aligns with desired governance arrangements. Flood governance stakeholders were surveyed in five flood-prone geographical areas in Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden.

The findings suggest that a reconfiguration of flood governance is underway with relatively little consensus regarding the specific arrangements and mechanisms in place during this transitionary period. In the five cases, stakeholders indicated that they wanted flood governance to be organized at multiple levels, with strong government involvement and with diverse actor groups, and through mechanisms that match the involvement of these actors. Some specific configurations, particularly involving the private sector, were seen as undesirable.

Stakeholders generally saw current governance systems as a long way from the ideals they described, except for government involvement. Suggested future research directions highlight the importance of including stakeholder perspectives in assessing flood governance, and following the transition in flood governance over time.


Read the article (external link to journal)

Read about the SEI Initiative on Transforming Development and Disaster Risk »